Friday, March 19, 2010

Modern Sammyrai Wet Dream: The History Channel’s Musashi Special

While cable’s History Channel isn’t producing an abundance of original shows dealing with actual history these days (instead giving us stuff like Monsterquest, Pawn Stars, American Pickers, Ax Men, and Ice Road Truckers-most of which are enjoyable fare), I was intrigued to see a promo for a new two hour special entitled ‘Samurai’. Well, at least I THINK it’s new-since virtually all of History Channel’s specials on pre-modern Japanese history are entitled ‘Samurai’, it’s hard to tell. It’s copyrighted 2009, so close enough. My wife Ayame was visiting from Japan and I thought it would be fun for her to see the West’s take on Japanese history. We were expecting the usual History Channel fare-nice visuals with a mixture of fact and legend that’s a small cut above most pop culture books. What we got was a modern sammyrai’s wet dream-an idealized two hour homage to that most overrated of samurai, Miyamoto Musashi.

The warning bells went off immediately when we saw that the show was going to be hosted by a martial artist, Mark Dacascos. As my father-in-law’s fond of pointing out, any history project with major input from a martial artist tends to be highly inaccurate and unreliable (as they’re usually only concerned with the promotion and glorification of martial arts). Well, OK, it could be worse-instead of Dacascos, they could have used Stephen Hayes. Dacascos is an accomplished martial artist, has appeared in several entertaining movies and TV shows (I remember him from ‘Crying Freeman’, although it was Shimada Yoko putting her goodies on display that provided the dramatic high point of the film), and seems like a nice enough guy-but it’s painfully obvious he knows little about Japanese culture or history.

Then things got real ugly. Dacascos stated that the program was going to focus on his attempt to follow in the footsteps of Miyamoto Musashi and rediscover the spirit of the ultimate warrior.
…..
…..
…..

What followed was two hours of the worst hero-worshipping dreck I’ve witnessed in a long, long time. The likes of it probably haven’t been seen since Leni Riefenstahl’s ‘Triumph of the Will’ back in the 1930’s. Loaded with historical errors, misconceptions, and-dare I say it-assclownery, sitting through it was an exercise in discipline and self control. Ayame thought it was one of the funniest things she had ever seen, especially since it was filmed in such a solemn and serious manner-she giggled throughout most of the show. For sheer brutality to Japanese ‘samurai’ history, it’s perhaps only been exceeded by the books ‘Samurai Battles’ and ‘Samurai: The Philosophy of Victory’. Here are some of the points that really rang the bell on the ol’ BS high-striker…and these are just the ones I remember. I would have taken notes, but I didn’t want Ayame to think I’m THAT much of a history geek…

-About a third to a half of the two hour running time consists of shots of Dacascos driving around Japan, using public transportation, sitting in his hotel room, or practicing Kung Fu. Great if you’re a Dacascos fan-not so great for history buffs.

-Despite being one quarter Japanese (as he continually reminds the audience), Dacascos butchers most of the few Japanese terms and words used in the show. ‘Edo’ is pronounced ala ‘Speedo’. A wooden sword is a ‘bokutwo’. Kumamoto is Cumamoto (well, maybe when Brick McBurly is visiting). And when referring to multiple samurai, he adds an ‘s’. This of course would earn him an immediate ban on the SA.

-Musashi, naturally, is referred to as the greatest samurai in history. Even though he’s not mentioned once in the six volume Cambridge History of Japan or most other serious histories.

-Musashi’s sword style was the original sword style used by samurai and everything after that branched off of this. This is every bit as ridiculous as it sounds-even the show mentions multiple other earlier sword schools.

-Even though a samurai was expected to be proficient with all types of weaponry, his primary weapon in battle was the sword. Well, not really-depending on the era, it would be the bow, naginata, spear, or arquebus. In battle, a sword would be a weapon of last resort.

-Bushido is brought up as the code that all samurai lived by. I weep and clutch my copy of Animeigo’s “Bushido-The Cruel Code of the Samurai” for solace.

-Hideyoshi is called the Shogun of Japan.

-Wheeled US Civil War cannon are shown as being present at the Battle of Sekigahara.

-It’s stated that 80,000 died at Sekigahara. Wow! That would mean roughly 80% of the troops that actually engaged in battle that day died. To say nothing of the wounded. Whose butt did they pull that figure out of?

-Dacascos states that at Sekigahara the “record shows that Musashi distinguished himself in battle”. Gosh, Mark, what record would that be? It’s not one I’ve ever heard of, or any American or Japanese historians have either. In fact, a great many of them doubt that Musashi was even AT Sekigahara.

-When describing Musashi’s duels with the Yoshioka school in Kyoto, the fact that he ambushed and killed a child as part of his initial attack in the final meeting is never brought up-even though there’s an extended recreation of the battle. This theme continues throughout the program-anything that portrays Musashi as less than heroic and the ultimate warrior is conveniently omitted.

-In a similar vein, Musashi's notorious lack of hygiene, reluctance to bathe, and his skin disease is never addressed.

-Musashi’s ploy of arriving late to duels was the first instance of psychological ploys in samurai history-he originated the concept of psychological warfare in 1604. Well, except maybe for that Sun Tzu guy. And the hundreds of recorded instances of psychological ploys covering the thousand years of Japanese history before Musashi, going back to the earliest surviving written works in Japan.

-Dacascos is seen performing random kata in the middle of the night with a katana while on an elevated pedestrian walkway across one of the busiest intersections in Kyoto. Nothing like leaving viewers with the impression that it's perfectly legal and all right to carry a sword around modern Japan and whip it out in the middle of a major city.

-In a particularly painful moment for your reviewer, Dacascos is sitting around and musing (this isn’t a direct quote since I didn’t write it down, but it’s close): ‘I think I’m realizing…I think I’m beginning to understand…the sword is special to a samurai. I think…(extra long dramatic Bill Shatner pause here)…the sword could be called…the soul of the samurai’. Dacascos says this with so much gravity and reverence that you’d almost believe he’s the first person to have this idea, even though it’s almost always in the first paragraph of every pop culture book on the samurai.

-While showing how a sword is forged, it’s stated that this forge uses only traditional medieval methods. While the smith uses an automated power hammer to pound out folds.

-Dacascos is helping out with traditional tandem hammer pounding on a sword. With a look of awe, he states he can feel energy radiating from the hammer. Thankfully, that’s as far as it goes-Dacascos doesn’t become the SA’s infamous ‘Dancing Sword Guy’.

-When the duel with Kojiro Sasaki at Ganryujima is examined, it’s the typical ‘Musashi, all alone, arrives late with boat oar and kills Sasaki’ scenario. No mention that Musashi actually had a large group of his followers with him, that it’s likely he only wounded Sasaki in the duel, and that Musashi’s posse later ambushed and killed Sasaki.

-The modern day town of Fukushima is referred to by Dacascos as ‘a town full of samurais’. No, Mark, samurai were removed as a class way over a hundred thirty years ago. Having samurai ancestry and taking part in reenactments doesn’t make you a samurai. It’d be great if they were, because then my father-in-law would be one and could make me the family heir. This bit also leaves viewers with the mistaken impression that the members of the Takeda School of Archery live a traditional samurai lifestyle 24/7, eschewing all modern conveniences.

-Samurai are described as the only group of people in world history whose sole job for over a thousand years was the practice and perfection of the art of warfare. Well, their sole job except for running farms, estates, day to day menial labor, and a million other bureaucratic, political, and administrative duties ranging from signing treaties with foreign countries to being a sandal bearer.

-The World War II Japanese super battleship Musashi was named in honor of Miyamoto Musashi. No, no, no! Like its sister ship the Yamato, it was named for a Japanese province in accordance with the existing naval naming standards.

-The battle of Osaka was the last battle in samurai history (and they have Musashi fighting on the side of the Tokugawa). Guess these guys haven’t heard of the later huge conflict of Shimambara, the scores of battles in the Bakumatsu, or the myriad other smaller battles. Which brings us to…

-…the fact that Musashi’s adventures during the Shimambara rebellion are not brought up despite the fact that as a staff officer of the Ogasawara it was a major episode in his life. Obviously, giving details of Musashi’s role in the wholesale slaughter of tens of thousands of peasants (many of them Christians) would tend to take the shine off the figure Dacascos is painting. Not to mention the fact that Mr. Invincible Sword Master was put out of action after being hit by a peasant with a thrown rock. Yes, the ‘Ultimate Warrior’ was defeated by the lowliest of the low, a completely untrained peasant with the most basic of weapons.

-The Tokugawa Shogunate banned all guns. Wrong again-there were tens of thousands of guns, likely even hundreds of thousands, in Japan, moreso than any European country was able to field at the time. This includes the Edo period, the time of the Tokugawa Shogunate.

-The samurai as a class ended in 1853. Nope, sorry, they held their status for another 20 years or so during which some of the most famous incidents in samurai history took place.

-Musashi was different from every other samurai because only HE was able to achieve enlightenment. Dacascos really says this. I suppose all those other samurai who retired, took religious vows, and devoted their lives to Buddha and the kami were just poseurs.

-In the one part of the show that rang true, Musashi’s modern day popularity is traced primarily to the Yoshikawa novel ‘Musashi’ which is described as romanticized and largely inaccurate. It should also be noted the show gives virtually NO mention to what Musashi was best known for before the Yoshikawa serial/novel appeared-his skills as an artist. Before the novel came out, he was far better known for his ink paintings and sculptures than for his reputation as a swordsman.

And this was just the very obvious, factually incorrect stuff. There’s more for those who dare to sit through it. All in all, it was the most wretched cesspool of blind Musashi worship and butt kissing imaginable. It points out the dangers inherent in letting a martial artist, real (as in Dacascos’s case) or imagined, within 100 miles where actual history is concerned (unless the martial artist in question is Karl Friday). ‘Samurai’ rivals Romulus Hillsborough’s book ‘Ryoma-A Renaissance Samurai’ for pure unadulterated adulation. For the hordes of Ghost Dog watching, video game playing modern sammyrai who profess to follow the ways of Bushido in our honorless modern world, it was a wet dream come true.

There were two moments in this production that encapsulated the entire fiasco for me. One is where Dacascos is hanging onto the straps of a streetcar and holding forth on the glory of Musashi-with a sticker promoting the ‘SMAP’ boys hovering over his head, seemingly giving its tacit approval to the ongoing buffoonery. The second even gives a possible explanation for where all the inaccuracies on display stem from. As Dacascos sits in his hotel room reading (more accurately, looking at the pictures in) an English language coffee-table book on samurai, I recognized that the book was written by none other than Stephen Turnbull. Need I say more?

38 comments:

  1. You mean Ayame doesn't realize exactly how much of a J history geek you are? I'm surprised.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Horribly hilarious!

    Why don't we make our own Mushysashi sammyrai documentary and sell it to the History Channel? In our documentary, we can portray the fact that Musashi never formally became a retainer of any daimyo because it was a sign of protest on his part against the evil baku-han system of the horrible Tokugawa guys. His refusal to bathe on a regular basis was another sign of protest.

    We can film it in Hawaii this Golden Week! I can be Kojiro and maybe we can get Brick to play Musashi (depending on his schedule) and we can shoot the duel on the beach in Waikiki. Kitsuno insists on playing the Shogun, though. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you. I watched and, as I knew nothing of Musashi, thought I was learning. Been googling the past three days trying to learn more. Appreciate your posting.

    Roman history I know cold and can dissect the History channel specials on Rome as you do to Dacascos' story. Sad that the channel is squandering their opportunity to present history.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "You mean Ayame doesn't realize exactly how much of a J history geek you are? I'm surprised."

    Oh, she knows, all right...she's even more so. But somehow, taking detailed critical notes while watching a History Channel would have been going over the edge a BIT too much!

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Thank you. I watched and, as I knew nothing of Musashi, thought I was learning. Been googling the past three days trying to learn more. Appreciate your posting.

    Roman history I know cold and can dissect the History channel specials on Rome as you do to Dacascos' story. Sad that the channel is squandering their opportunity to present history."

    Thanks, John. It's great that you wanted to look into the history further. It is a shame that History Channel has moved away from real history towards 'pop culture' history, but sadly the pop culture stuff will always garner higher ratings.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds hysterical. I mean seriously, where did he learn Samurai history from? Karl Pilkington? Sounds like the History Channel took this special's view on Japanese history at face value and didn't bother to see if he got it right or even remotely close. On the other hand, as a comedy this special should be filed under so bad it's good collection.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Too bad this turned out to be so based upon legend instead of fact, which I always find more interesting. While I enjoy The History Channel and Discovery at times, after watching a show on a topic I know well there is always a question of how wide and deep the intellectually dishonesty of both tends to be. Some of the self-annointed "experts" they have chosen couldn't pass any sort of serious vetting process. A U.S. Naval historian I know, who has happened to be one of their experts several times (and is quite good at it), says many of them are just calling it "The Channel" at this point, omitting the obviously undeserved descriptive. While they sometimes turn out some good work, as we now know much of it is not, and the third-party productions they often purchase (on Nostradamus, or Maya codes, or UFOs…) are just embarrassing. Far from dispelling legends, myths and superstitions so we can evolve as a culture, they play upon our most primitive needs to understand our fears, see conspiracy everywhere, and ignore the truth in favor of whatever we want to believe. Aside from wanting to cater to the average viewer and make a buck, they are intellectually lazy. They really are, at times, much worse than useless.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mike, that pretty much sums up the problems with the History Channel (The Channel-I like that!) in a paragraph. It's changed a lot since its inception, and even though I probably still watch it more often than any other channel, find it a constant source of frustration. It could just be so much more than what it is now.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for the heads up, I'll pass on the History channel from now on.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nice recap. As one reader noted, this is a huge problem with the history channel. The sad truth is that most "history" does not sell ad space. If the channel is not bringing in revenue they can't afford to air programming. So, entertainment and dramatization gets in the way of history.

    There recent run of "2010" end of the world crap is but one of many examples. They spend 95% of the time interviewing questionable experts or outright kooks and the other 5% talking to legitimate academics or critics. Naturally, that latter camp gets labeled as "skeptics", as if that's a bad thing!

    2012 Myths Debunked

    ReplyDelete
  11. so.. it wasn't just me who thought it was utter drivel?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I must know--who is "SA’s infamous Dancing Sword Guy"?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anytime you have a "kung-fu" expert doing a karate piece it's suspect at best!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with so much of what you said, I wish they would stop airing such ridiculousness on TV. I really want some good solid english language documentaries on Samurai history, but they are not too easy to find. I see this is by no means a good one. Saying "Samurais" is the proper plural form of the word Samurai is such an amateurish mistake that I am astounded that they allowed that to make it on air. Wow. Just one thing though, what do you have against Stephen Turnbull? He has received multiple awards for his work on Japan and is considered one of the leading english language authoritues on Japanese history. I enjoy his work quite a bit. What are your grievances?

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know his real name, but he was a member of the SA's Yahoo email group. He claimed that his sword talked to him and told him when it wanted to be brought out to 'dance'. He then went postal and siad that we were infringing his religious beliefs when everyone laughed at him.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Annonymous, Turnbull does not cite sources very well. Some of his older books have few if any sources cited but he has gotten a bit better recently with citations. Also, even on some of his relatively recent books such as "Nagashino: Slaughter at the Barricdes" has facts that that have generally been discredited such as his statement that Nobunaga and Ieyasu had 3000 gunners and used them in a revolving volley fashion.

    But knowing that he has some decent works IMO such as his book on the Korean war, "Samurai Invasion".

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Anonymous,
    I too read Turnbull's work (I've read every volume on Japanese history he's written) and enjoy much of it, but after awhile his limitations start displaying themselves. His Osprey books are notorious for sloppy and bad editing, and hence are filled with errors like names being spelled wrong, getting dates incorrect, photos having mismatched captions, and the like. Some of this is Osprey's fault, but some of it's his. Turnbull also relies far too much on English language works and 'pop culture' works in Japanese like Rekishi Gunzou that are known to be largely based on Edo period legends and Meiji era misrepresentations. Because of this, much of his work lags 10-15 years behind the current scholarship in Japan, and being based on legends it often comes off sounding like the History Channel Special (hence my comparison). Sometimes he's just flat out wrong, like when he states (not once but twice) in 'Strongholds Of The Samurai' that the concrete reproduction of Fushimi Castle had been demolished-but get on Google Earth and you'll see it's 'alive and well'. And finally, the most serious issue of all, are the accusations of plagarism-for example, virtually all of the samurai entries in the 'Samurai Sourcebook' were taken verbatim and uncredited from E. Papinot's 'Historical and Geographical Dictionary of Japan'. There are other examples of this, even reaching to content of our Samurai Wiki.

    Turnbull is a good introductory author to Japanese history, and I will say that much of the stuff he's produced in the last three or four years has been much better researched with more reliable sources. I guess the real problem is that he's usually held up as the shining pinnacle of samurai scholarship, where superior books by scholars such as Karl Friday, Thomas Conlan, Jeffery Mass, and many others tend to be ignored.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The history channel, discovery channel, Nat Geo, or any other channels meant to be informative; have simply become nothing more than ratings machines filling peoples heads with mindless dribble meant to entertain not to inform. It is horrible how a show like this can have hundreds of people involved and no one cares enough to say, "hey, maybe we should check and make sure this is true". I even heard once on National Geographic, the narrator on a "planet awareness" type of show blaming the slowing of the earth's rotation on dams and New York City rush hour traffic- NOT KIDDING! Just remember big business has no shame when it comes to money, The bigger the business the more they're willing sell out or even sell their own children for money.

    ReplyDelete
  19. A little porcentage of the world that see that show, google further and find this page.

    I think this is the cycle.

    Some people want just fun.. some others wanna the truth.. and this is in the middle of both.

    americans can't understand 100% bushido. but some of we try.

    I like movies and I like S.A. I live in peace and ready to kill :P

    Salutes.

    ReplyDelete
  20. only a samurai like Musashi can deserve a special like this one.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Most overrated samurai would be 47 Ronin, in my view. But Musashi is a tough contender for that title (along with Yoshitsune and Ryoma)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thanks for a bitingly funny critique! I have not seen this show, and it's not a stretch to imagine it, having seen and read a few wallyworld interpretations of this and other subjects.
    Even as an amateur inquirer into matters Samurai, I now approach most popular web and television treatments, and some books, with a mild inoculation of skepticism.
    You are dead on, cutting to the bone, and I still remain,
    yours truly,
    Desperately Seeking Musashi

    ReplyDelete
  23. Meyek,

    How is this a "karate piece"?

    ReplyDelete
  24. It isn't, and isn't flagged as such. It's popular among martial arts sites so probably that affects search engine results.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This was a good article, but there are quite a few things that even you got wrong.
    For example, ive yet to read of Musashi having a group of followers for the duel with kojiro on Ganryu island, he was a lone warrior, he was not one for involving other people, let alone a "posse", he turned up, late, on his own, knocked Kojiro out and left, in a nutshell.

    Im glad you cleared up some points, for example the 12 year old Yoshioka school master (the last heir to the school), but yet again, you yourself fail to mention WHY he did it, all you seemed to care about was slandering the name of Musashi... he killed the 12 year old boy as he was the last descendant to the school, when he killed him on the final meeting of the duels (where he was to be ambushed himself) it caused a moral drop for the last disciples of the school and most of them fled.

    Yes Musashi is a little glorified, especially in the documentary (the Yoshioka school ambush scene infuriated me as it was wrong in most ways) but he has every reason to be "glorified" as he was an extraordinary human being who is living testament to what each of us can achieve if we set our minds to it.

    Oh and by the way, Musashi was not a samurai, sorry to say it, he wasn't, he was a ronin and he was proud of it, he did not want to serve anyone, he was more than equal to the samurai but he didn't serve anyone, therefore he was a ronin, just thought i'd throw that point in there as its wrong that the history channel call this documentary "samurai".

    ReplyDelete
  26. Nope, nothing brought up in the article is wrong-it's all well documented historical fact from reliable sources, most of them in Japanese. Musashi did indeed bring a retinue of his supporters/disciples/hangers-on to Funajima (the island that was later renamed Ganryujima in honor of Sasaki) and depending on the source, they either ambushed and killed Sasaki after the duel (Musashi had only wounded him) or set upon Sasaki and killed him after Musashi had knocked him down during the duel. The 'Musashi arrives alone, kills Sasaski, and leaves' is a legend glorified and perpetuated in Yoshikawa's book and every fictional work that came after-it's not fact. You can read about this in virtually any modern Japanese book on Musashi, or if you don't read Japanese, in "Miyamoto Musashi: His Life and Writings" (so far, the best and most balanced book written on Musashi in English).

    And yes, Musashi was indeed a samurai, although not for his entire life. He was brought into service by the Ogasawara (where he was defeated by a peasant with a rock during the Shimabara rebellion) and later (around 1640) by the Hosokawa. He died a samurai. He did indeed serve at least two masters during his life. Musashi for most of his life just wasn't the type of samurai most clans wanted to hire during an era of relative peace-he was rough edged, unkempt, had massive hygiene problems, and would make any clan that hired him a magnet for disruptive dueling (and put under scrutiny by the Tokugawa).

    We didn't mention Musashi's possible motivations for killing a child during the duel with the Yoshioka sword school because it was outside the scope of the article. It was brought up specifically to illustrate that the History Channel steadfastly avoided anything that would put Musashi in a bad light.

    As to Musashi being an "extraordinary human being who is living testament to what each of us can achieve if we set our minds to it"-well, I rather see it more like "living testament to what blind hero worship and reliance on fictional accounts can do to enhance someone's reputation". Musashi was little different form the dozens, even hundreds, of itinerant swordsman of his time who traveled around, fought duels, wrote swords treatises, etc. He just happens to be the one lucky enough to get the PR boost from an enormously popular book in 1930's Japan, and further among Westerners when it was translated for release here. And quite frankly, what did he achieve? He killed dozens of people during pointless duels meant only to satiate his ego and boost his reputation. While he renounced killing during his later years (except for the Shimabara rebellion), it's a shame that so many people were murdered before he 'found himself'.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous: Ronin are not samurai? That's funny. Ronin were masterless samurai. You could maybe say Ronin were former samurai but it is not really correct to just state that ronin were not samurai. Musashi was a ronin, hence, he was a samurai.

    The book Tatsunoshi mentioned, "Miyamoto Musashi: His Life and Writings" is indeed an excellent and honest book about Musashi. I highly recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Toshogo: Before I start, the names John, at least now im only half hidden by the "anon" status.
    Ronin... sorry, wrong choice of description for Musashi, although wasn't he classified a Ronin after the first battle he was in due to having his master defeated?
    I shall read that book =], im always looking to further my understanding of Musashi's life and arts, thank you for the recommendation.

    Tatsunoshi, While I understand the annoyance at the program for over-zealously glorifying Musashi, It did seem as though you we're trying to corrupt the readers opinion on Musashi, even though the documentary wasn't his fault alone.

    When you mentioned about the child originally it did kind of seem that you was implying Musashi killed an innocent child in cold blood, I know that's not how it happened, or what you meant at all, but in another readers uninformed perspective I believe they would view it as Musashi was someone who just goes around ambushing children prior to some duel with a martial arts school.
    I think all I am saying is that somewhere along the lines you should of mentioned that he killed the child, the head of the school, instead of tarnishing him with "ambushed and killed a child".

    While I understand why your opinion of him is low and the fact he had duels to satisfy his ego, he still was an extraordinary human, he fought in duels with a wooden sword, against real swords and most of the time it was to the death... such as life was in those days, you cant blame him for living in such times.
    I haven't read the 1930's Yoshikawa's Musashi, I heard its a good read, but alot of it is fictionalized to fill the gaps and so on, so I can see your point in that respect.

    My apologies for causing a stink, but I wasn't too for the denouncing of Musashi as anything less of what he actually was, okay, maybe a little denouncing was needed due to the documentary, but not as much as you enforced, I feel some readers have gone away feeling more ill towards Musashi than what they should.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I started watching this documentary hopping for something decent but decided to skip it after 20 min of myth-assliking. Thanks for your review, now I know my instinct was correct.

    BTW, at least I found your cool site thanks to that crapmentary ;)

    ReplyDelete
  30. I got through about 41 minutes and 59 seconds. It's the part where we realize why Dacascos (even though I like him) never became a decent name in show-business: He can't act his way into making us believe he's having a genuine epiphany on the link between sword, soul and samurai.

    This documentary is such a steaming pile of crap. I would prefer the facts and not the musings of a guy who has obviously never connected with his Japanese side, set him loose and let him butcher the history, the language, and somehow work in his martial arts background.

    There is pretty much zero relevance in the credentials of Dacascos here. I really wished he had approached this as if he had no ties to it, and took the journalistic edge to it. Instead we get this guy who hams up every shot, overemphasizes every take, embellishes the script and downright does a worse job than Tom Cruise in his samurai movie that shall not be named.

    ReplyDelete
  31. It was the journey of a rich kid trying to look cool in his black trench coat and sunglasses, feel like a "warrior" and validate his heritage. As someone else said he hammed it up in every shot - archery, swordmaking, etc. - it seemed like 1/2 the shots he said "make sure to get me on camera doing X! I look like a real samurai!" Actually at one point he was dressing up like a samurai and some old Japanese guy said "you look like a samurai" and Dacascos looks at him with a puppy dog face and says "yeah I'm 1/4 Japanese" - poor guy was clearly in need of some validation.

    Even worse was when he would read Musashi's weak "philosophy" and look all deeply affected by it, looking into the camera or off into the distance and make some inane comments on it. See the last several minutes of the documentary for a prime example (I expected a few tears even). The guy is a total egomaniac (like most actors I suppose), but it makes the show pretty lol-worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I agree with most of what the article says, but I am puzzled as to the claim that Musashi had anyone with him at all to Ganryu island, let alone a posse, and certainly no trace that said posse killed Sasaki. And really, if that had truly been the case, what source would there be to speak of it? I very much doubt that this posse would leave any witnesses.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Wow, after reading this and the comments I'm glad I decided to read some reviews before I began getting too far into that documentary. I really dislike the fact that history channel has the hardest time doing anything but history. Thank you for your in depth scrutiny of a show that would have me learning, falsely, about a time period I'm genuinely interested in. I don't suppose you would happen to know of any accurate documentaries about Japanese history at all? I may have to just pick up a book again and read something about this stuff rather than watching anything about it now.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Nishimoto-chanSunday, May 25, 2014

    I've watched the documentary twice and enjoyed it both times. It contains relevent references to The Book of Five Rings, and is a decent snapshot introduction of the Japanese warrior class.

    Many considerations must be taken when making a documentary, especially one which will cover an individual's entire lifetime. Foremost of these are time limits and channel agendas, which restrict what can be allowed during the editting process, for no other reason than it would take too long. The creators are thus forced to summarize, and some of their sources may be different from others. One should consider all factors carefully before openly criticizing.

    Any individual who takes so much time and effort to criticize the works of others must feel their own work rather inadequate. Most of the opinions stated (and facts conveniently omitted) in this review by TheShogunHouse appear to be motivated by personal vendetta against a revered historical figure and a successful martial artist (niether one of which, one can assume, is something Tatsunoshi can claim to be).
    Few sources are cited, which draws into question the validity of the entire post as anything more than the self-satisfied pseudo-intellectual rantings of someone who wishes to impress his own opinions onto others about a century and culture that none of us here are fully capable of understanding.
    I get the impression that the author is, like many armchair historians, wannabe-warriors and weeaboos, content with an excuse to boast opinions of a culture and epoch we are completely unqualified to comprehend, much less represent or champion as any kind of authority.

    But as they say in the States, any asshole can fart an opinion, and those who have enough of them blog.
    Watch the documentary as part of your own research, not as an end-all-take-all, and keep an open mind.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hello John Donnachaidh,

    Most documentaries in English about samurai are sensationalistic and sadly lacking, much like the Musashi one. The Japanese do lots of great ones but few if any have ever been released overseas. You'll see the odd, highly specialized documentary like "Samurai: Back From The Dead" (Kamakura era battlefield skeleton forensics) or "Ritual: The Samurai Of The Soma Noma Oi".

    However, the best documentary by far is PBS's "Japan: Memoirs of a Secret Empire". Narrated by Richard Chamberlain (of 'Shogun' fame), it is a perfect example of how to make an entertaining but scholarly and valid documentary that makes 'Musashi' look like a grade school anime project. Many of the top names in premodern Japanese scholarship are interviewed and the focus is on the Sengoku/Edo periods. It's well produced, thought provoking, will well done re-enactments and rock solid scholarship. Runs for several hours in multiple parts as well. Check it out-you won't be sorry. Happy viewing!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hello, Nishimoto-chan. Based on your handle, you fancy yourself the Western Musashi, eh ^_^ ? Did you know that putting an honorific like ‘chan’ with your own name is considered a major lapse in etiquette by the Japanese? Don’t worry, it’s a common newb mistake and we’re glad to help educate you.

    Ah, yes, I see you employed the old “I can’t come up with any facts of my own or refute any points made by the author so I’ll just launch into a personal attack because he dared speak poorly of my sacred cow” gambit. Try instead discussing any of the points made or constructing an argument of your own. Addressing the facts since you seem to want to question them so much. Since it seems your knowledge on the subject is limited, try reading “Miyamoto Musashi: His Life and Writings” by Kenji Tokitsu (Shambhala Publishing-don’t worry, it’s in English). You’ll find that it (along with virtually every other book on Musashi in English and Japanese that actually performs research and approaches him from an historical aspect rather than printing the gushings of a martial artist that accepts Yoshikawa’s fictional book as gospel) will reiterate all of the points made in the article. That’s the beauty of the post-you don’t have to believe us or a single word we say. You can find all the points we made well laid out in extensively researched and detailed history books.

    As to Sengoku/Edo period Japan being (in your words) "...a culture and epoch we are completely unqualified to comprehend, much less represent or champion as any kind of authority", you are quite incorrect. That sort of attitude is almost insulting to Japanese culture-in effect, the old stereotypical Western attitude of the "unknowable, exotic Orient". There are thousands, tens of thousands, of first person accounts and records giving extensive details of the times and culture in the words and feelings of the people who lived it. There is Buddhist and Confucian literature along with tracts like the Hagakure and Life-Giving Sword to learn the idealized view of society and behavior written by the idle elite. Then there are the realistic accounts and letters written by those more pragmatic-the peasants, townspeople, artisans, fisherman, prostitutes, maids, merchants, actors, mid and low level samurai, and everyday clergy. Combined with the fiction and literature of the times along with the cornucopia of surviving art pieces, we have an excellent idea of what the 'culture and epoch' was like. We encourage you to expand your horizons and read a few of these works, with a good starting point being "Lust, Commerce, and Corruption: An Account of What I Have Seen and Heard, by an Edo Samurai". You will learn what being a samurai was like in REAL life, not the goofy, glorified, and insanely unrealistic version seen in the Musashi docudrama.

    And yes, we did consider the factors that go into making a documentary before writing the post. The Dacoscos 'Musashi' fails at virtually every level for the reasons stated and so many more. Sloppily researched, outright fiction presented as fact, totally lacking in objectivity, and a fawning fanboy attitude. History raped by a channel that only cares about ratings, going for the sensational, playing to the lowest common denominator and giving us ciphers like ‘Pawn Stars’ and ‘Ice Road Truckers’. Not to mention Dacoscos’s wooden emoting and performance.

    One thing you did get right is that we’re not a ‘revered historical figure’. If that means we’ll never be the subject of a History Channel ‘mockumentary’, that’s something to be happy about. Sorry, but until you’re ready to address the facts, thanks for playing our game, and sorry you didn't do so well.

    And since you were classy enough to bring up the subject of a-holes, perhaps now would be an auspicious time for sammyrai the world over to remove their heads from Musashi's back passage. This frame of mind is the fundamental meaning of "no-sword". One should give careful scrunity to this kind of mentality.

    ReplyDelete
  37. If the history channel butchered the documentary on Musashi, still...what about his Book of the Five Rings? Is it ramblings of an old man who was not respected as a Samurai? I was interested in reading it, but after reading how history channel used legends as fact, why is Musashi's book still getting published? I am neutral in all this btw.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Well, I guess another of my historical heroes has just been discredited by recounting of real history. Why does this keep happening? That said, I think I'll respect him for what he really was, a guy who had some talent and the brains to make others believe he's more than he is, honorable or dishonorable, and a man who was canny enough to survive into old age and write a book while reflecting on the full life he led.

    Oh and getting hit in the head by a thrown rock can mess you up pretty good, I learned that the hard way. No human is immune to it, though helmets do help.

    ReplyDelete